- #Better graphics card than xfx radeon hd 6850 full
- #Better graphics card than xfx radeon hd 6850 series
There's also morphological anti-aliasing, a post-processing, full-scene filtering technique that's not limited to polygon edges or alpha-tested surfaces it uses DirectCompute acceleration, and is faster than super-sampling.
AMD is also addressing Nvidia's 3D Vision stereoscopic 3D technology with its own HD3D initiative, which requires only an HDMI 1.4–compatible display and the appropriate software.Īnisotropic filtering has undergone a number of refinements that now enable smoother transitions between filter levels. AMD has remedied one deficit its last-generation cards displayed compared to Nvidia's Fermi releases by nearly doubling tessellation performance, which should make many DirectX 11 (DX11) games look and perform much better. Like other 6000-series cards, the 6850 offers a number of notable technological improvements over the 5000 series. The card is nine inches in length and, because of its large fan–heat sink assembly, will take up two expansion slots.
#Better graphics card than xfx radeon hd 6850 full
AMD estimates that the 6850 will only use 127 watts of power at full load, and 19 watts when idling the card requires only one six-pin power connector from your PSU. It's got 1GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 256-bit memory path operating at 4 Gbps. The 6850 has 1.5 teraflops of compute power, a core clock speed of 775 MHz, and 960 stream processors. These begin with its specs, which are above average for a card in this price range. So for now, let's just worry about the Radeon HD 6850's knowable facts. Because the cards are so near in so many aspects of their performance, that price difference makes it all but impossible to say which is absolutely better across the board. But once all the dust settled, the 768MB GTX 460, the card we had so admired at $199, had landed at $169 (list)-and a number of models are available on (today, at any rate) for even less.
The most significant is that AMD and Nvidia waged a fierce pricing–PR war this week, alternately dropping prices and commenting (you may wish to consider that a euphemism) on each other's decisions. Sorry we can't be more definite than that right now-there are a lot of variables at play here, very few of them related to the actual performance of the cards themselves.
#Better graphics card than xfx radeon hd 6850 series
We no longer have to ask whether AMD has met the challenge, because the 6000 series is here, with one of its inaugural models the Radeon HD 6850 priced at $179 (list), and the answer is: Uh, maybe. The GTX 460, however, changed all that, giving Nvidia a much-needed shot of adrenaline in a very important place-the sub-$200 price range-and increasing the excitement surrounding AMD's own next-generation offerings. The folks at AMD were blindsided by Nvidia's release of the GeForce GTX 460 back in July, and who could blame them? While Nvidia struggled mightily to release its new Fermi-based hardware late last year and into 2010, AMD reaped huge swaths of market share with its 5000 series of innovative video cards, and looked like it might crush its competitor forever.